Brief intelligence
Your brief and source materials are scored for gaps, contradictions and weak inputs before any concept exists. A weak brief is flagged, not built on.
A structured method for trade shows, brand activations, product launches and cultural moments. It takes your brief and produces distinct experiential concepts in which every feature is tied to a result you can measure. It is AI-assisted and founder-directed: no concept reaches you without the judgment of co-founder Joe Ronalter.
Your brief and source materials are scored for gaps, contradictions and weak inputs before any concept exists. A weak brief is flagged, not built on.
Three strategically distinct routes, each with the space, the guest journey, the signature moment, content strategy and risks.
Every feature mapped to a measurable KPI, with a confidence level and a recommended measurement method.
Our research practice measures it before, during and after: a concept pre-test, in-the-moment feedback at the event and re-contact at 30–90 days for lasting brand lift and the ROI readout.
A guided product demo sequence
Attendees explore longer, more deliberately
Stronger product comprehension
Dwell time and demo completion rate
And it refuses to guess. Source inputs are scored against a structured rubric, and below a quality bar no concept is generated. Weak inputs are sent back for more detail.
Encrypted, project-isolated storage. Never pooled across clients, never used to train AI models.
A founder directs every step. Nothing runs autonomously on your data.
A written data-handling statement opens every engagement.
Sample engagement. Alder & Wend is a fictitious brand, used here to show how our process works from brief to blueprint.
SXSW example · Alder & Wend (fictitious)A premium sustainable footwear maker wants to introduce itself to a national creative audience at SXSW and prove its values are real, not marketing. It can't outspend the category leaders. Its guardrails: no celebrities, no sustainability superlatives, no free product, no music, no screens unless they show the making.
Brief score: 76/100, strong. One gap flagged: no prior experience at SXSW scale, so every route uses conservative assumptions about Austin operations.
A walkable archive of every material in the shoe, from forest to foot, with a live cobbler making one pair over eight days. Most ownable, lowest risk.
A free repair workshop for shoes of any brand. The brand earns trust by repairing shoes it didn't make. Strongest measurement story.
A greenhouse where biodegradable shoes visibly return to the ground over the festival. Highest cultural payoff, highest production risk.
| Feature | Behavior | Brief KPI | Method | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free repair service | Visitors check in their shoes | Repairs completed | Intake counter | High |
| Email capture at intake | Visitors opt in to follow-up | Leads and opt-in rate | Lead capture app | High |
| Wall of repaired shoes | Visitors photograph and share | UGC and hashtag volume | Social listening | High |
| 30–90 minute wait | Sustained time in the space | Average dwell time | Claim-ticket tracking | High |
| Post-event email with shoe portrait | Re-engagement at 60–90 days | Purchase consideration | CRM attribution | Medium |
| Pre/post perception study | Audience perception shifts | Brand affinity lift | Pre/post panel | Medium |
Each route arrives as a full blueprint: strategic rationale, spatial design, guest journey, signature moment, content strategy, risks, KPI map and visualization prompts. In this sample, the recommended route is B, with Route A as the fallback if budget tightens.